[DAYS_LEFT] days left of your Medeconomics free trial

Subscribe now

Your free trial has expired

Subscribe now to access Medeconomics

GMS contract 2014/15: will you be a winner or a loser?

Specialist medical accountant Laurence Slavin provides a comparison of the effects of the new contract on three different GP practices.

The new contract looks likely to benefit practices that have been poor QOF achievers
The new contract looks likely to benefit practices that have been poor QOF achievers

Will you gain or lose under changes to the 2014/15 GP contract that come into force next April? For an instant idea of where you might stand, take a look at the comparison (below) of the effect of contract changes on three example practices of different sizes and profitability.

Click on the table to view it as a PDF (in larger print).

The comparison suggests that moving money from QOF to core funding is likely to benefit poorer performing practices. After all, if you did badly with QOF, and never gained this funding, you will now find yourself receiving a share of the resources released back into core funding. The same is true for patient participation and the two DESs that will be reinvested in the global sum, which appears to be a backtrack from the quality initiative of 2004.

We would like to know how you will fare under the new contract and your views on the negotiated deal. Please comment below or send comments or contract queries (which we will endeavour to answer) to Medeconomics' associate editor Sarah Wild (sarah.wild@haymarket.com).

 


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles
and free email bulletins.

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Would you like to post a comment?

Please Sign in or register.

Database of GP Fees




Latest Jobs