Premises funding

Q: We lease our surgery from the developer who built it. A PCT estates director informally told us that other GPs in the area who occupy LIFT premises receive significantly more reimbursement than we do towards their service charge. I had a lengthy dialogue with the PCT, which ended with it saying that our reimbursement is correct. But I have been subsequently told it might be a question of wording, that the LIFT practices may be getting this other reimbursement as additional rent rather than as a service charge. The PCT claims its policy is to treat people equally. However, we have also heard that the district valuer disagrees with what is actually a two-tier policy. What can we do? Is there somewhere we can check that the PCT was right to say our reimbursement is correct?

YOU NEED TO SUBSCRIBE TO VIEW THIS ARTICLE

Already subscribed? Log in here

Subscribe to Medeconomics

Sign up for a 14-day free trial

Please enter your details

Forgotten Password?

Forgotten password?

Having trouble signing in?

Contact our online support team at support@medeconomics.co.uk

[DAYS_LEFT] days left of your Medeconomics free trial

Subscribe now

Your free trial has expired

Subscribe now to access Medeconomics

"I did not have to think twice about subscribing to Medeconomics... I find this website the only place I can find an up to date and accurate database of fees"

Pratice Manager, Canterbury