Quality pay

Q: The senior partner retired on 30 September 2010 and a new full-time partner, who had recently finished her GP training, joined for a six-month mutual trial. This went well and on 1 April 2011 the practice confirmed the terms on which she would stay with us. The stages at which she moves to a parity profit share are a 65 per cent share during the trial period progressing to 75 per cent after a satisfactory trial period. Full parity will follow on 1 April 2012 after 18 months with the practice. In June 2011, we received our final QOF payments for the 2010/11 year. Normally the partner share of income is 2/7 for full-time partners and 1/7 for part-time partners. We decided that because our new partner had only worked with us for six months of the 12-month QOF period, she should be paid QOF money for six months pro rata to her 65 per cent profit share for the period. However, one partner now feels she should be paid for QOF for the whole of 2010/11 including six months when she was not working at the practice. I feel this is unnecessarily generous. Can you advise?

YOU NEED TO SUBSCRIBE TO VIEW THIS ARTICLE

Already subscribed? Log in here

Subscribe to Medeconomics

Sign up for a 14-day free trial

Please enter your details

Forgotten Password?

Forgotten password?

Having trouble signing in?

Contact our online support team at support@medeconomics.co.uk

[DAYS_LEFT] days left of your Medeconomics free trial

Subscribe now

Your free trial has expired

Subscribe now to access Medeconomics

"I did not have to think twice about subscribing to Medeconomics... I find this website the only place I can find an up to date and accurate database of fees"

Pratice Manager, Canterbury